 |
|
| |
West Virginia Nurses Association’s Economic and General Welfare Chair Rue Hairston, RN. |
|
|
|
| |
Here’s a great news report from Katrina Blomdahl, writer-researcher for RNs Working Together, a coalition of 10 AFL-CIO unions representing more than 200,000 registered nurses nationally.
In this tough economy, West Virginia nurses at the Appalachian Regional Healthcare (ARH) system are breathing a sigh of relief after the Kanawha County Circuit Court rejected an appeal by their employer to deny unemployment benefits to the nurses who walked the picket line from October to December 2007.
Turns out the hospital blew a filing deadline that the courts apparently intend to enforce.
To the nurses of the West Virginia Nurses Association/UAN it’s a real vindication. Not only did the court refuse to allow the employer to skirt the law for its own convenience—it jammed up the hospital system’s union-busting practices.
West Virginia Nurses Association’s Economic and General Welfare Chair Rue Hairston, RN, says the nurses
are ecstatic about the decision because it’s the David and Goliath story. Goliath keeps coming and David keeps winning.
As previously reported here, ARH hired replacement nurses and housed them in vacant wings of the hospitals.
Hiring replacement workers serves as a union-busting technique meant to weaken the impact of a strike—but this time, it didn’t work. According to its own appeal, the hospital system shelled out more than $4.4 million at the Beckley facility alone to pay for replacement nurses and expenses rather than negotiating fairly with the nurses who were already there.
But even that kind of money didn’t buy management out of negotiating with workers. It was a tough strike that went on for longer than the nurses wanted, but with the national union movement behind them, the nurses got what they were fighting for—keeping their union and winning a contract with safer staffing levels and higher patient care standards.
Because ARH had spent so much money “staffing up” with replacement nurses during the strike to keep the hospitals running at full capacity, it was unable to make the case to the Labor Dispute Appeal Tribunal (the first stop for all labor disputes in West Virginia) that it was not liable for unemployment benefits.
According to the Labor Dispute Appeal Tribunal, there was no “stoppage of work” and “no substantial curtailment of ARH business” during the strike. In a nutshell, that means ARH will have to pay up.
ARH appealed to the Board of Review in November 2008, but the board upheld the tribunal’s decision. ARH then took its appeal to the Kanawha County (W.Va.) Circuit Court, but failed to file the appeal in a timely fashion and the court dismissed the case. ARH now has four months to appeal to the state Supreme Court.
The ongoing battles with ARH are particularly heartbreaking for Hairston, who has a keen sense of the hospital’s cultural history. Before ARH acquired them, 10 hospitals in the region were miners’ hospitals. She explains:
These hospitals are old UMWA hospitals. This is coal territory and the hospitals were created to give miners and their families essential medical care. Now, here we are—union nurses, over 50 years later—fighting to provide the quality care that these hospitals were developed for. I can’t help but to think that John L. Lewis would be turning over in his grave.
Just like the miners that came before her, Hairston maintains the courage of her conviction when it comes to her union. She concludes:
I want to let our sisters and brothers in the labor movement know that we’re still fighting. We’ll advocate for quality care for patients no matter what we’re going through. That’s what keeps us going. Patients deserve better.
Recent Comments